The Balancing Act: Creating New Academic Support in Writing While Honoring the Old

Jennifer Good, Susan Barganier

Abstract


At many universities, the WAC program organizationally falls within Academic Affairs whereas Learning Centers often fall within Student Services or an English Department, causing political and practical difficulties in collaboration that impede the creation of effective support in writing throughout students’ academic careers. To combat these distinctions and divisions, the chief administrators of a WAC program and Learning Center (LC), the university's writing center, collaborated to bridge the divide between the student and professional tutors funded through each program.

When the WID intern program, managed through WAC, was in its embryonic stages of development, the WAC and LC administrators recognized the strength and power of connecting the two areas of academic support through deliberate and thoughtful collaboration. For instance, in contrast to the WID intern program that is philosophically aligned with theories of supplemental instruction, the LC tutors have extensive experience and training in tutoring pedagogy. Capitalizing on the strengths of each philosophical tenet and encouraging collaboration between tutors and interns became imperative to each program’s health and growth.

The interactions between administrators when considering WAC program development, the use and allocation of budget and resources (space) to support the LC or WID interns when necessary, the involvement of LC tutors in WAC faculty training and WID intern training are shared, demonstrating how rich collaboration that thwarts competition can promote effective academic support in writing.


Keywords


Writing Center Administration; Writing Across the Curriculum

References


Barnett, Robert W., and Rosen, Lois, M. “The WAC/Writing Center Partnership: Creating a Campus-wide Writing Environment.” Writing Centers and Writing Across the Curriculum Programs: Building Interdisciplinary Partnerships. Eds. Robert W. Barnett and Jacob S. Blummer. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1999. 1-12. Print.

Blanc, Robert A., DeBuhr, Larry. E., and Martin, Deanna. C. “Breaking the Attrition Cycle: The Effects of Supplemental Instruction on Undergraduate Performance and Attrition.” The Journal of Higher Education 54.1 (1983): 80-90. Print.

Carter, Michael. “Ways of Knowing, Doing, and Writing in the Disciplines.” College Composition and Communication 58 (2007): 358-418. Print.

Chanock, Kate. “A Shared Focus for WAC, Writing Tutors and EAP: Identifying the ‘Academic Purposes’ in Writing Across the Curriculum.” The WAC Journal 15 (2004): 19-32. Print.

Ning, Hoi Kwan, and Downing, Kevin. “The Impact of Supplemental Instruction on Learning Competence and Academic Performance.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (2010): 921-939. Print.

Pemberton, Michael. “Rethinking the WAC/Writing Center Connection.” Writing Center Journal 15 (1995): 116-133. Print.

Severino, Carol, and Traschel, Mary. “Theories of Specialized Discourses and Writing Fellows Programs.” Spec. issue of Across the Disciplines, 5 (2008): Web. 7 Jul. 2012.

Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges. The Principles of Accreditation: Foundations for Quality Enhancement. Decatur, GA: Author, 2010. Print.

Threatt, Tiffany. “Implementing Writing Across the Curriculum Principles into Departmental Writing Centers. Praxis: A Writing Center Journal, 6.2 (2009): Web. 7 Jul. 2012.

Zawacki, Terry M. “Writing Fellows as WAC Change Agents.” Spec. issue of Across the Disciplines, 5 (2008): Web. 7 Jul. 2012.


Full Text: PDF HTML

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.